Cognitive Neuroscience Society

The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • Annual Meeting
        • General Information
          • What to Expect at CNS 2023
          • CNS 2023 Mobile App
          • CNS 2023 Giveaway
          • CNS 2023 Giveaway Winners
          • Accessibility at CNS
          • General Information
          • Code of Conduct
          • Dates and Deadlines
          • Hotel Reservations
          • Poster Guidelines
          • Poster Printing Discount
          • Annual Meeting Workshop Policy & Application
          • Exhibit with us!
        • Program
          • Thank you to our Partners
          • CNS 2023 Program Booklet
          • Schedule Overview
          • Program-at-a-Glance
          • CNS 30th Anniversary Dance Party
          • Keynote Address
          • George A. Miller Awardee
          • Distinguished Career Contributions Awardee
          • Young Investigator Awardees
          • CNS at 30: Perspectives on the Roots, Present, and Future of Cognitive Neuroscience
          • Invited-Symposium Sessions
          • Symposium Sessions
          • Data Blitz Session Schedule
          • Poster Schedule & Session Information
          • JoCN Travel Fellowship Award
          • GSA/PFA Award Winners
          • Workshops, Socials & Special Events
        • Registration
          • Registration
          • Registration FAQ
          • Registration Policies, Cancellations & Refunds
        • News/Press
          • CNS 2023 Press Room
          • CNS 2022 Blog
          • CNS 2021 Blog
          • CNS 2020 Blog
        • Submissions
          • 2023 Poster Printing Discount
          • Submission Requirements
          • Submit a Poster
          • Submit a Symposium
          • GSA or PFA Application
          • Data Blitz
          • Frequently Asked Submission Questions
        • Archive
          • CNS 2020 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2019 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2018 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2017 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2016 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2015 Conference Videos
          • Previous Meetings Programs & Abstracts
  • About CNS
    • Boards and Committees
    • CNS Statement: Black Lives Matter
  • Membership
    • Information and Benefits
    • Join or Renew Membership
    • Membership FAQs
    • Member Discounts
    • Newsletter
      • Submit an Announcement
      • Current Newsletter
      • Newsletter FAQs
      • Past Newsletters
  • Awards
    • George A. Miller Award
    • Fred Kavli Distinguished Career Contributions Award
    • Young Investigator Award
    • Young Investigator Award Nominations
    • 2023 YIA Nomination Form
    • JoCN Travel Fellowship Award
  • News Center
    • CNS Blog
    • CNS 2023 Press Room
    • CNS 2023 Blog
    • CNS 2022 Blog
    • CNS 2021 Blog
    • CNS 2020 Blog
    • CNS 2019 Blog
    • Blog Archives
    • Quick Tips for Getting Started on Twitter
    • Media Contact
  • My CNS
  • Contact Us
post

We’re Hard Wired for Cranberry Sauce: Why Color Matters for Nutrition

November 22, 2016

https://www.flickr.com/photos/arvindgrover/4204494356Cranberry sauce is perhaps a non-obvious star of the Thanksgiving dinner table. With its rich red color – whether homemade or from the can – the holiday favorite is actually part of the hardwiring in our brain: A new study finds that people favor red-colored foods over green ones, and consistently undervalue the caloric content of green foods over red ones. The overall effect means that most people are likely to be drawn to cranberry sauce over green beans this Thursday.

“The cranberry sauce should be more arousing,” says Raffaella Ida Rumiati of SISSA in Italy, senior author on a new paper in Nature Scientific Reports. “Arousal predicts wanting and mediates preparatory behavior,” she says. This is owed to “trichromatism” in people and other primates that allows us to visually evaluate food for nutritive and other properties based on color. The researchers hypothesized that the effect of color on visual evaluation of food comes from the relationship between energy-content and color food found in nature.

creait: https://www.flickr.com/photos/joyosity/9426715380In the study, Rumiati, with Francesco Foroni and Giulio Pergola, asked healthy participants to rate how arousing they perceived a large set of food and non-food items. The researchers then independently estimated the calorie content of food stimuli and asked participants to rate the perceived calorie content. They also asked participants rate the level of transformation of different food images; the non-food images were a control.

They found that the color content of food specifically, and not non-food, predicts arousal and perceived calorie content. The brighter the red, the higher the arousal; and the brighter the green, the less the perceived calorie content. And this result held for even non-natural, “transformed” food – meaning you could evaluate green pesto, for example, as having fewer calories than a red marinara sauce.

CNS spoke with Rumiati about these results, their evolutionary links, and what it means for all of us this Thanksgiving and beyond into the holiday season.

rumiatiCNS: How did you become personally interested in color and food evaluation?

Rumiati: I was invited to join an interdisciplinary research program on food for which my school received some money. I thus had the opportunity to build a small but very keen research group with Dr. Foroni, Dr. Pergola, and some Ph.D. students. Food soon became central to my interests because it cuts across several domains. Color popped out as an interesting aspect of food to investigate right from the beginning as we were collecting our database of stimuli to use in our experiments.

CNS: How do you define trichromatism?

Rumiati: Trichromacy is a feature of the visual system that allows us to ‘color’ the surrounding environment. Humans express three different receptors that feature different sensitivity to specific wavelengths, i.e. colors. Other primates, such as the lemurs, only have two of them. Thus, trichromacy is an attribute of species with three photoreceptors.

CNS: Why is trichromatic color important evolutionarily?

Rumiati: Trichromatic color vision is suggested to have evolved to improve foraging by distinguishing between red and green nuances. It has been hypothesized that this peculiarity of our visual system has represented an evolutionary advantage because more reddish nuances in fruits and leaves are generally associated with higher energy or greater protein content.

CNS: What have we known previously the relationship between trichromatic color and food evaluation?

Rumiati: Previous evidence showed that trichromatic primates are better off than dichromates in judging ripeness of fruits and edibility of leaves. What was missing is whether trichromatism is also associated with visual evaluation of nutritional and appetitive properties of food in humans.

CNS: What was the new insight you were seeking?

Rumiati: We aimed to ascertain whether color plays a role also in human food evaluation and more, whether this heuristic is generalized to all foods. The second part of out goal is very important, because nowadays it is possible to have, for instance, a green-colored cake that is much more energy dense than a strawberry – hence, this heuristic is no longer valid.

credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/44381592@N05/4226349056CNS: What were your most excited or surprised to find?

Rumiati: The most surprising finding in our view is that the effect emerges in spite of correcting for a number of possibly confounding variables, including other basic visual features of food, the level of food processing, the estimated calorie content, and even participants’ physiological state, such as hunger. It is a relatively small, but highly generalized effect, and this is what one would expect from a hard-wired heuristic. Moreover, the effect is only significant for food and there is no effect of general brightness (e.g., blue light does not matter). We were surprised to find a clean effect, when factoring out all confounders we had measured, particularly given the complexity of food evaluation.

“our participants appeared to systematically underestimate the energy content of greener food items, which is relevant for people observing dietary restrictions.”

CNS: What do you most want people to understand about this work? Does it change how we should think about food and our choices, especially when it comes to artificially colored food?

Rumiati: The main point is that because of the hardwired association between greenish nuances and lower energy content we tend to value less the food with higher green-color content. This has been a strong advantage when food was scarce and we needed to search for it. Nowadays this mechanism can backfire due to the abundance of food available and to the fact that our brain is generally more attracted to any food (natural or transformed) that has high reddish-nuances (as indexed by arousal assessments in our experiment). While for natural food this is a heuristic, for transformed food it can become a bias. Importantly, our participants appeared to systematically underestimate the energy content of greener food items, which is relevant for people observing dietary restrictions.

CNS: What’s next for this line of work?

Rumiati: In the next study, that should hopefully come out soon, and in which we investigate the categorical distinction between transformed and natural food, we are concerned with the influence not only of the intrinsic characteristics of the food on how our brain processes it, but also on characteristics intrinsic to the perceiver, such as the BMI. Food neuroscience is also becoming very useful in making sense of anomalies observed in food behaviours of patients with different neurological conditions including Parkinson Disease and primary dementia. Stay tuned!

CNS: Anything I didn’t ask you about that you’d like to add?

Rumiati: We need to understand better how food selection is mediated by brain mechanisms, and how this process changes along the lifespan. Understanding these mechanisms should help us in making better decisions in human nutrition.

-Lisa M.P. Munoz

By lmunoz Filed Under: featured Tagged With: emotion, food, vision

Previous article: Sleep Offers a Window Into Human Intelligence
Next article: Making Language Research Less Alien: The Science of Arrival

Recent Posts

  • CNS 2023: Day 4 Highlights
  • Psychedelics and Cognition: A New Look
  • CNS 2023: Day 3 Highlights
  • CNS 2023: Day 2 Highlights
  • Forget About It: Investigating How We Purge Thoughts from Our Minds

Blog Archives

Quick Tips for Getting Started on Twitter

Cognitive Neuroscience Society
c/o Center for Mind and Brain
267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95618
916-955-6080: for CNS Membership Questions
805-450-7490: for annual meeting questions about- registration, posters, symposium
916-409-5069: Fax Line
email: meeting@cogneurosociety.org

Recent Posts

  • CNS 2023: Day 4 Highlights
  • Psychedelics and Cognition: A New Look
  • CNS 2023: Day 3 Highlights
  • CNS 2023: Day 2 Highlights
  • Forget About It: Investigating How We Purge Thoughts from Our Minds

Archives

Blog Archives

Previous Meeting Programs and Abstracts

Past Newsletters

All contents © Cognitive Neuroscience Society 1995-2019

Add to Calendar

Add to Calendar
04/16/2022 11:00 AM
04/16/2022 12:00 PM
America/Los_Angeles
How Prior Knowledge Shapes Encoding of New Memories
Description of the event
Grand Ballroom A
Create an Account

Login Utility