Cognitive Neuroscience Society

The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • Annual Meeting
        • General Information
          • What to Expect at CNS 2023
          • CNS 2023 Mobile App
          • CNS 2023 Giveaway
          • CNS 2023 Giveaway Winners
          • Accessibility at CNS
          • General Information
          • Code of Conduct
          • Dates and Deadlines
          • Hotel Reservations
          • Poster Guidelines
          • Poster Printing Discount
          • Annual Meeting Workshop Policy & Application
          • Exhibit with us!
        • Program
          • Thank you to our Partners
          • CNS 2023 Program Booklet
          • Schedule Overview
          • Program-at-a-Glance
          • CNS 30th Anniversary Dance Party
          • Keynote Address
          • George A. Miller Awardee
          • Distinguished Career Contributions Awardee
          • Young Investigator Awardees
          • CNS at 30: Perspectives on the Roots, Present, and Future of Cognitive Neuroscience
          • Invited-Symposium Sessions
          • Symposium Sessions
          • Data Blitz Session Schedule
          • Poster Schedule & Session Information
          • JoCN Travel Fellowship Award
          • GSA/PFA Award Winners
          • Workshops, Socials & Special Events
        • Registration
          • Registration
          • Registration FAQ
          • Registration Policies, Cancellations & Refunds
        • News/Press
          • CNS 2023 Press Room
          • CNS 2022 Blog
          • CNS 2021 Blog
          • CNS 2020 Blog
        • Submissions
          • 2023 Poster Printing Discount
          • Submission Requirements
          • Submit a Poster
          • Submit a Symposium
          • GSA or PFA Application
          • Data Blitz
          • Frequently Asked Submission Questions
        • Archive
          • CNS 2020 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2019 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2018 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2017 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2016 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2015 Conference Videos
          • Previous Meetings Programs & Abstracts
  • About CNS
    • Boards and Committees
    • CNS Statement: Black Lives Matter
  • Membership
    • Information and Benefits
    • Join or Renew Membership
    • Membership FAQs
    • Member Discounts
    • Newsletter
      • Submit an Announcement
      • Current Newsletter
      • Newsletter FAQs
      • Past Newsletters
  • Awards
    • George A. Miller Award
    • Fred Kavli Distinguished Career Contributions Award
    • Young Investigator Award
    • Young Investigator Award Nominations
    • 2023 YIA Nomination Form
    • JoCN Travel Fellowship Award
  • News Center
    • CNS Blog
    • CNS 2023 Press Room
    • CNS 2022 Blog
    • CNS 2021 Blog
    • CNS 2020 Blog
    • CNS 2019 Blog
    • Blog Archives
    • Quick Tips for Getting Started on Twitter
    • Media Contact
  • My CNS
  • Contact Us
post

Sharpening Understanding of How the Deaf Brain Sees

June 17, 2019

Q&A with Stephen Lomber

We often see it in superhero movies: When people are deprived of one sense, they develop superhuman powers in another sense. While those depictions may be exaggerated, the underlying premise has a real scientific basis. When the brain is deprived of input from one sense, such as hearing, it often compensates with above-normal performance in another sensory system, such as vision. Over the past decade, various neuroimaging, physiological, and other neuroscience studies have converged to create a more complete picture of the brains of the deaf, and, in particular, how visual abilities are enhanced.

In a new review paper published in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, a team of scientists led by lead author Caroline Alencar and senior author Stephen Lomber at the University of Western Ontario sought to synthesize what researchers know from both human and animal studies on the deaf. “We wanted to identify common themes,” Lomber says.  “Ultimately, our paper highlights similarities in the human and animal studies of the deaf. It also draws attention to how plastic the cortex is following any form of sensory deprivation, in this case – deafness.”

CNS spoke with Lomber about this research review paper, past work on the topic, and future directions.

CNS: How did you become interested in this research area?

Lomber: I became interested in this research area when I considered how cochlear implants activate a naïve sensory system, or how does a dormant sensory pathway deal with activation?  However, to really consider this question, it is necessary to understand what “deaf” auditory cortex is doing in the absence of visual input.  Another way to think about it is to ask the question of “what is auditory cortex doing just prior to the activation of a cochlear implant?”

CNS: In brief, what have we known previously about visual function in the brains of deaf people?

Lomber: In 2006, Bavelier and colleagues published a wonderful review paper on all the human visual psychophysical studies performed to date.  It identified that visual enhancements in the deaf are not a general condition, but that specific visual functions are improved.

CNS: Can you give an example of a study you looked at in your review that was particularly novel in its design or approach?

Lomber: A paper in 2010 by my team really helped move the field forward.  It established the causal link between crossmodal plasticity in cortex and enhanced visual functions in the deaf.  It also buttressed the idea that the cortex is organized more by specific behaviors, or tasks, and not by sensory modality.  We found that regions of auditory cortex mediate particular behaviors regardless of the type of sensory input.

CNS: In your review, what were your most excited to find?

Lomber: How far the field has come in the past decade.  Significant progress has been made in studies of human subjects, particularly with functional imaging, and animal models using reversible deactivation methods.

CNS: What’s next for this line of work? 

Lomber: Functional investigations will continue to guide the field, both psychophysical and functional imaging.  Electrophysiological studies of changes at the neuronal level are going to be key to understanding the psychophysical changes following hearing loss.

CNS: Is there anything I didn’t ask you about that you’d like to add?

Lomber: There is a remarkable similarity between the findings identified in deaf subjects and those identified in blind subjects.  Both types of studies demonstrate that the cortex is organized more by particular behaviors, or tasks, and not by sensory modality.

-Lisa M.P. Munoz

 

By lmunoz Filed Under: featured Tagged With: deaf, vision Leave a Comment

Previous article: Exploring the “Dark Side” of Brain Imaging
Next article: Controlling the Urge to Relieve Pain

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest from Twitter

Tweets by @CogNeuroNews

Cognitive Neuroscience Society
c/o Center for Mind and Brain
267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95618
916-955-6080: for CNS Membership Questions
805-450-7490: for annual meeting questions about- registration, posters, symposium
916-409-5069: Fax Line
email: meeting@cogneurosociety.org

Recent Posts

  • Poverty: What’s the Brain Got to Do With It?
  • Unraveling Graceful Human Learning Over Time
  • Looking Forward to Understand Working Memory
  • From the Neurology Clinic to the Lab and Back Again: Addressing Frontal Lobe Syndromes
  • When Philosophical Questions Turn to Neuroscience Experimentation

Archives

Blog Archives

Previous Meeting Programs and Abstracts

Past Newsletters

All contents © Cognitive Neuroscience Society 1995-2019

Add to Calendar

Add to Calendar
04/16/2022 11:00 AM
04/16/2022 12:00 PM
America/Los_Angeles
How Prior Knowledge Shapes Encoding of New Memories
Description of the event
Grand Ballroom A
Create an Account

Login Utility