Schedule of Events | Search Abstracts | Invited Symposia | Symposia | Rising Stars Session | Poster Sessions | Data Blitz

Poster A131

Conflict Expectation Shapes Prefrontal Activity: Distinct Mechanisms of Anticipatory and Reactive Control

Poster Session A - Saturday, March 29, 2025, 3:00 – 5:00 pm EDT, Back Bay Ballroom/Republic Ballroom

Anas Khan1 (anaskhan1107@gmail.com), Colin Hoy2,3, Kris Anderson, Vitoria Piai4,5,6, David King-Stephens7,8, Kenneth Laxer8, Peter Weber8, Jack Lin9, Robert Knight3, Nicole Bentley1; 1University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, 2University of California, San Francisco, 3University of California, Berkeley, 4Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 7California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 8University of California, Irvine, 9University of California, Davis

Goal-directed behavior requires adjusting cognitive control to both react to and prepare for conflict. Previous work indicates theta oscillations and population activity in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) are critical for reactive control. However, the neural mechanisms supporting proactive control are less clear. Here, we investigated the neural basis of behavioral adaptations when control is prepared in anticipation of conflict using intracranial EEG (iEEG) in dmPFC and dlPFC during a Stroop task where conflict frequency was manipulated across blocks. We observed canonical conflict-driven increases in dmPFC and dlPFC local population activity, as indexed by high frequency activity (HFA), and in dmPFC theta power. Conflict also suppressed theta power in both regions after the response, and accentuated a pre-response beta desynchronization selectively in dlPFC along with a post-respond beta rebound in both regions. Importantly, we show dmPFC theta power increased before trial onset when conflict was expected, and theta, beta, and HFA conflict signals in both regions were enhanced when conflict was rare and diminished when conflict was common. These findings reveal shared population but dissociable oscillatory dynamics in dmPFC and dlPFC during reactive conflict processing, highlight dmPFC theta as a potential substrate for proactive control, and refine the roles of dmPFC and dlPFC in control adaptations.

Topic Area: EXECUTIVE PROCESSES: Monitoring & inhibitory control

CNS Account Login

CNS2025-Logo_FNL_HZ-150_REV

March 29–April 1  |  2025

Latest from Twitter