Cognitive Neuroscience Society

The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • Annual Meeting
        • General Information
          • What to Expect at CNS 2023
          • CNS 2023 Mobile App
          • CNS 2023 Giveaway
          • CNS 2023 Giveaway Winners
          • Accessibility at CNS
          • General Information
          • Code of Conduct
          • Dates and Deadlines
          • Hotel Reservations
          • Poster Guidelines
          • Poster Printing Discount
          • Annual Meeting Workshop Policy & Application
          • Exhibit with us!
        • Program
          • Thank you to our Partners
          • CNS 2023 Program Booklet
          • Schedule Overview
          • Program-at-a-Glance
          • CNS 30th Anniversary Dance Party
          • Keynote Address
          • George A. Miller Awardee
          • Distinguished Career Contributions Awardee
          • Young Investigator Awardees
          • CNS at 30: Perspectives on the Roots, Present, and Future of Cognitive Neuroscience
          • Invited-Symposium Sessions
          • Symposium Sessions
          • Data Blitz Session Schedule
          • Poster Schedule & Session Information
          • JoCN Travel Fellowship Award
          • GSA/PFA Award Winners
          • Workshops, Socials & Special Events
        • Registration
          • Registration
          • Registration FAQ
          • Registration Policies, Cancellations & Refunds
        • News/Press
          • CNS 2023 Press Room
          • CNS 2022 Blog
          • CNS 2021 Blog
          • CNS 2020 Blog
        • Submissions
          • 2023 Poster Printing Discount
          • Submission Requirements
          • Submit a Poster
          • Submit a Symposium
          • GSA or PFA Application
          • Data Blitz
          • Frequently Asked Submission Questions
        • Archive
          • CNS 2020 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2019 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2018 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2017 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2016 Conference Videos
          • CNS 2015 Conference Videos
          • Previous Meetings Programs & Abstracts
  • About CNS
    • Boards and Committees
    • CNS Statement: Black Lives Matter
  • Membership
    • Information and Benefits
    • Join or Renew Membership
    • Membership FAQs
    • Member Discounts
    • Newsletter
      • Submit an Announcement
      • Current Newsletter
      • Newsletter FAQs
      • Past Newsletters
  • Awards
    • George A. Miller Award
    • Fred Kavli Distinguished Career Contributions Award
    • Young Investigator Award
    • Young Investigator Award Nominations
    • 2023 YIA Nomination Form
    • JoCN Travel Fellowship Award
  • News Center
    • CNS Blog
    • CNS 2023 Press Room
    • CNS 2023 Blog
    • CNS 2022 Blog
    • CNS 2021 Blog
    • CNS 2020 Blog
    • CNS 2019 Blog
    • Blog Archives
    • Quick Tips for Getting Started on Twitter
    • Media Contact
  • My CNS
  • Contact Us
post

How Loss of Hearing Leads to Improved Vision in the Deaf

July 22, 2014

credit: Jonas BergstenWe have all heard the amazing things the brain can do when deprived of one of the senses – stories about blind people with incredible hearing or deaf people with amazing visual skills. That is because the part of the brain responsible for hearing reorganizes itself in the deaf to take in visual information (and vice versa in the blind). A new study of deaf people explores how that reorganization occurs and how it is affected by use of hearing aids.

The new work builds on previous research showing that visual motion could activate auditory regions of the brain in deaf people. “Our work differs from previous studies in that we followed up on this result, first by looking at the functional connectivity of the reorganized auditory region, and then by looking at the role of hearing aid use,” says Martha Shiell of McGill University.

Shiell and colleagues recruited a group of deaf people who varied in their degree of hearing loss and in the duration of their hearing-aid use to compare functional changes in their brains to those of hearing people. The researchers showed the participants a visual stimulus that was either moving or staying still to isolate in the fMRI the areas of the brain specific to motion. They wanted to see how varying degrees of hearing affected how brain processed this visual motion.

They found that in the deaf participants, an auditory area of the brain – the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) – responded to visual motion instead of auditory information, as it did for the hearing participants. And in the deaf, the STG was more connected to areas of the brain that process visual information. Furthermore, using a hearing aid for longer periods of time reduced the extent to which this reorganization occurred.

Shiell spoke with CNS about these important results, just published in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,  and what they mean for deaf people, as well as the general population.

Martha ShiellCNS: What is cross-modal reorganization?

Shiell: The term “cross-modal reorganization” describes a phenomenon where a region of the brain changes in its sensitivity to information from different sensory systems. This phenomenon is usually studied in the context of sensory deprivation, such as blindness or deafness, where the parts of the brain that would normally process the missing sense reorganize to process input from other senses instead. For example, as in our study, an area of the brain that normally responds to auditory information changes in deaf people, who don’t use auditory information, so that it responds increasingly to visual information.

CNS: How did you personally become interested in studying cross-modal reorganization?

Shiell: I started studying cross-modal reorganization in deaf people during my undergraduate degree, when I did an independent study project with Dr. Melvyn Goodale and Dr. Jacqueline Snow at Western University. At the time I thought it was a great model to understand plasticity in humans.

Since coming to McGill and working with Dr. Robert Zatorre, I’ve realized that it is also a powerful tool to understand normal brain function: We can learn a lot about the way that the brain is organized by looking at how it changes itself under different circumstances. These changes are surprisingly specific; if we can identify these specifics, then we can deduce what that region is supposed to accomplish under normal circumstances.

CNS: How did you identify the subjects for your study?

Shiell: We looked for participants who were early deaf – that is, deaf since birth or within the first year of life – and with no cochlear implants. We wanted some variability in the characteristics of our participants because we were interested in how cross-modal reorganization might vary under different circumstances, so we recruited people who varied in their degree of residual hearing, either from differences in hearing loss (from severe to profound deafness) or from their hearing aid use.

This is unlike most previous research, which focused on people who are congenitally and profoundly deaf. While the latter group is ideal for establishing strong effects, we need to examine cross-modal reorganization under varying circumstances in order to fully understand the mechanisms that support it.

CNS: What was the significance of the activity you found in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and its connectivity?

Shiell: In deaf people, the posterior superior temporal gyrus responded to visual motion stimuli, while in hearing people, this same area responded to auditory stimuli. This is evidence for cross-modal plasticity after deafness.

In deaf people more than in hearing, the activity within the posterior superior temporal gyrus correlated with activity in primary visual cortex, demonstrating that the reorganized auditory cortex is increasingly interacting with the visual system. This is relevant because it illustrates that cross-modal reorganization affected not only auditory areas, but also how auditory areas interacted with the rest of the brain. Identifying this network was relevant for understanding the mechanisms that support cross-modal plasticity, and will help us generate hypotheses on what is going on in the brain after deafness.

CNS: What are the implications of your study for use of hearing aids?

Shiell: The results of our study suggest that, in profoundly deaf people, there is a relationship between hearing aid use and the degree of cross-modal reorganization that occurs in auditory regions. Because we’ve measured correlation, we don’t know which factor is driving this relationship, but we can say that a long-term hearing aid user probably has less cross-modal reorganization than a short-term hearing aid user. This information can be helpful for someone who is considering a cochlear implant, because we know that the effectiveness of cochlear implants varies according to how much reorganization has occurred.

CNS: How does the effectiveness vary? Is less reorganization better for the cochlear implants?

Shiell: The current hypothesis is that reorganization after deafness inhibits rehabilitation through cochlear implants. This is based on the theory that if the auditory cortex reorganizes to respond to non-auditory input during deafness, then it is no longer available to respond to auditory input when hearing is restored.

CNS: What were you most excited to find in your results?

Shiell: The most exciting result was the functional connectivity between the reorganized auditory region and primary visual cortex. Notably, this occurred for an area of primary visual cortex that processes the peripheral visual field, which is also where deaf people tend to show an advantage in visual tasks compared to hearing people. This finding may be a clue for understanding the anatomical changes that occur in deaf people that support their enhanced visual abilities.

We also had a surprising result, which was the relationship between hearing aid use and cross-modal reorganization – we didn’t expect that hearing aids would be relevant for people with profound deafness, who by definition have very little residual hearing. This result, together with reports from the participants themselves, show that hearing aids can be useful for at least some profoundly deaf participants, and that their use interacts with cross-modal reorganization. Now that we have identified that this relationship exists, we need to do more research to understand it.

CNS: What is the significance of your findings for the general population?

Shiell: The brain is plastic – it can adapt to maximize its effectiveness in different sensory environments – but it does so in only a very specific way, that can be influenced by many external factors. The story of neuroplasticity is a complex one, that we are only beginning to understand.

CNS: What’s next for this work? What do you ultimately hope to accomplish?

Shiell: We are now using MRI to look at brain anatomy in deaf people, in order to find anatomical changes that may support the cross-modal reorganization that we have observed. Our guiding goal is to understand what occurs in the auditory regions of deaf people so that these areas process visual information, and why those specific changes occur and not others. Ultimately, this will help us understand the principles of brain organization and plasticity.

-Lisa M.P. Munoz

The paper, “Reorganization of Auditory Cortex in Early-deaf People: Functional Connectivity and Relationship to Hearing Aid Use” by Martha M. Shiell, François Champoux, and Robert J. Zatorre, was published online on July 7, 2014, in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

 

 

By lmunoz Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: deaf, hearing, perception, visual

Previous article: Drawing Draws on Complex Cognitive Processes
Next article: Why It’s So Tough for People in Power to Truly Feel Your Pain

Recent Posts

  • CNS 2023: Day 4 Highlights
  • Psychedelics and Cognition: A New Look
  • CNS 2023: Day 3 Highlights
  • CNS 2023: Day 2 Highlights
  • Forget About It: Investigating How We Purge Thoughts from Our Minds

Blog Archives

Quick Tips for Getting Started on Twitter

Cognitive Neuroscience Society
c/o Center for Mind and Brain
267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95618
916-955-6080: for CNS Membership Questions
805-450-7490: for annual meeting questions about- registration, posters, symposium
916-409-5069: Fax Line
email: meeting@cogneurosociety.org

Recent Posts

  • CNS 2023: Day 4 Highlights
  • Psychedelics and Cognition: A New Look
  • CNS 2023: Day 3 Highlights
  • CNS 2023: Day 2 Highlights
  • Forget About It: Investigating How We Purge Thoughts from Our Minds

Archives

Blog Archives

Previous Meeting Programs and Abstracts

Past Newsletters

All contents © Cognitive Neuroscience Society 1995-2019

Add to Calendar

Add to Calendar
04/16/2022 11:00 AM
04/16/2022 12:00 PM
America/Los_Angeles
How Prior Knowledge Shapes Encoding of New Memories
Description of the event
Grand Ballroom A
Create an Account

Login Utility